Hauser: “Even the WHO distances itself from the EU’s political and ineffective coercive measures during Corona.” “It therefore needs even more a seamless clarification of the consequences and the political reasons behind the disastrous Corona measures of the EU and the nation‑states.” 🟢 Regarding the FPÖ PM My comment: Remarkable how the WHO now withdraws from responsibility – and in doing so pulls the ground from under the feet of those politicians who have hidden behind it for years. One should remember: Ignazio Cassis, for example, justified the practice of counting deaths as COVID deaths in a blanket manner, citing WHO recommendations. Politics has repeatedly invoked these recommendations – and now acts as if it had not borne its own responsibility. The problem was never only a lack of proportionality. Many of these measures were not merely questionable, but actively destructive – and they benefited especially those who profited from vaccine marketing. Calling these measures “foolish” would be an understatement – more accurate: destructive, and with intent. See also the conversation I had with Hauser on the topic “Blue Orchid”: Secret EU simulation revealed: “Blue Orchid” – the covert pandemic dress rehearsal (in 2019!) 〰️🟩 My latest book: The Lithium Conspiracy 🟩 Subscribe to the newsletter now. 🟩 Subscribe to the channel: @MichaelNehls (mn)

Translated from German, view original

The polls are becoming increasingly clear… Losing coalition or re‑elect? 🇦🇹 Austria has a clear opinion on this! 💪

Translated from German, view original

Not a single day passes without the Justice issuing an incomprehensible judgment. The collapse on appeal of the sentences of those who led to the beheading of Samuel Paty by the jihadist Anzorov is a catastrophe. All French people sympathize with the professor's family, who are once again being tested. __📲 Share on X!

Translated from French, view original

The WHO distances itself from the prescribed madness coronavirus measures such as vaccination and mask mandates, school closures, lockdowns, etc., which, according to its own statements, it never prescribed, see my press release on this in report24.news!‼ "Now the rats are leaving the sinking ship," so the popular saying aptly applies! ☝ Please share! 👍➡ Follow Gerald Hauser on Telegram: https://t.me/GeraldHauser 🎥 Follow Gerald Hauser also on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@GeraldHauser_fpoe

Translated from German, view original

French nuclear deterrence cannot be shared. Only France must be able to decide, in full autonomy and full sovereignty, on the use of our nuclear arsenal. It is an inviolable and non‑negotiable principle. Any violation of our national territory and vital interests must be punished in proportion to the threat, by a unilateral decision of the President of the Republic; likewise, only the President determines exactly what our vital interests are and the precise degree of the threat. At the same time, France’s vital interests are not limited to the hexagonal framework. This has been a constant since the very origin of French nuclear deterrence: General de Gaulle already said in 1964 that “France must feel threatened as soon as the territories of Federal Germany and the Benelux are violated.” It has been a constant assumed by all our leaders since then; its visionary character is perfectly demonstrated by current European and international events. It is this set of vague modalities that underpins French strategic ambiguity. And it is on this strategic ambiguity that nuclear deterrence rests, the keystone of our military apparatus. Emmanuel Macron’s announcements, who wishes to station nuclear missiles in Europe without ceding or sharing control, do not appear to violate the fundamentals of our nuclear deterrence doctrine. This idea resembles the already effective reality of our ballistic‑missile submarines: a projection of our French power beyond our borders. Likewise, the participation of our European allies in military exercises involving nuclear strike simulations strengthens our role as a strategic leader in defense in Europe. Our army has remained a major asset. It is an opportunity to support a resurgence of French influence in Europe and the world on one of the few elements of our power and credibility that Emmanuel Macron has not degraded. The world is becoming unstable and dangerous again; France and Europe must be able to defend themselves alone, with allies, but without depending on them. It is therefore imperative to strengthen European preference in defense, to reinforce our defense industrial and technological base and increase our production capacities. Our security is played beyond our borders. All of France’s history demonstrates this. If I firmly oppose the emergence of a co‑decision principle in the use of our nuclear force, I can only encourage France to occupy its place in the security of our continent: the first. 📲 Share on X! 👉 Join Identité Libertés!

Translated from French, view original

🔴TO WATCH LATER🔴 https://youtu.be/RCJkgW0Ajb8 The EU Parliament has recently decided that the EU Commission can forcibly redistribute medicines between member states in a crisis!‼ This means the EU is massively intervening in national competences and adding another building block toward completing a European Health Union! ☝ Decisions about health policy must remain within national competence. We stand for strong nation‑states instead of an EU central state. 💪 Here is the video: https://youtu.be/RCJkgW0Ajb8 ➡ Follow Gerald Hauser on Telegram: https://t.me/GeraldHauser 🎥 Also follow Gerald Hauser on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@GeraldHauser_fpoe

Translated from German, view original

The ZDF is producing an eleven‑minute report about Austria's Patriotenradio (https://www.austriafirst.at/) and about the FPÖ's media strategy, but it doesn't even know how to spell our party chairman Herbert Kickl correctly. One doesn't need to know more about the state of the forcibly financed media – whether in Germany or Austria.

Translated from German, view original