EUforYa

EUFORYa

Track EU Parliament activity with clear, human-friendly updates.

🔎
EU Commission: New Law Work
Can make law

Revamping Air Travel Rules for Better Passenger Protection

Published March 12, 2026

Goal: Fair passenger protection

Community improvement

Clickbaity title? Suggest change

The European Commission has reviewed 243 proposed changes to EU rules that protect air passengers, accepting 115, partially accepting 92, and rejecting 36 amendments, with the goal of strengthening passenger rights and improving national enforcement while respecting airlines' financial limits.

Travel
Travel

Summary

The European Commission has reviewed 243 amendments proposed by the European Parliament to the EU rules that protect air passengers.

  • Accepted as‑is: 115 amendments (e.g., 1‑8, 12, 14‑19, 21, 24, 26‑33, 35‑39, 42, 45‑47, 53, 56, 59‑60, 64‑66, 69, 71, 77‑78, 80‑83, 89, 92, 95‑96, 98, 109‑110, 113, 115‑117, 119‑123, 125‑128, 130, 135, 137‑142, 147‑148, 150, 153, 157, 164‑167, 169‑172, 174‑178, 181, 183‑184, 188, 190, 195‑198, 200‑201, 203, 206‑210, 241‑243).
  • Partly accepted (needs wording changes or agreement in principle): 92 amendments (e.g., 9‑11, 16, 20, 22‑23, 40, 43‑44, 49, 51‑52, 70, 74, 84‑86, 88‑91, 93‑94, 97‑100, 111‑114, 124‑134, 136, 143‑144, 149‑152, 154‑156, 158‑163, 173, 179‑180, 185‑187, 190‑192, 194, 195‑199, 205, 211‑215, 217‑239).
  • Rejected: 36 amendments (13, 25, 34, 41, 48, 50, 54, 55, 57‑58, 61‑63, 67‑73, 75‑76, 79, 87, 108, 112, 118, 129, 145, 151, 168, 182, 186, 191, 202, 204, 213‑214, 240).

Key points of the Commission’s opinion

  1. Objective of the proposal – Strengthen passenger rights, clarify rules, improve national enforcement, and better handle baggage issues while respecting airlines’ financial limits.

  2. Accepted amendments – Clarify definitions, passenger rights, carrier and intermediary duties, complaint handling, national enforcement bodies, penalties, and cross‑border cooperation. These changes improve the legal text and passenger protection.

  3. Partly accepted amendments

  • Baggage – The Commission wants a separate review before adding a free hand‑bag right.
  • Extraordinary circumstances – Accepts a non‑exhaustive list with a clear deadline for carriers to prove such circumstances.
  • Compensation amounts – Will adjust amounts every five years instead of three to reduce administrative work.
  • Pre‑filled forms – Supports giving passengers ready‑made forms for claims, but needs clearer wording.
  • Delegated powers – Accepts delegation for an unlimited period, not just five years.
  • Complaints about baggage – Supports the idea but wants a technology‑neutral way to provide forms.
  • Persons with specific needs – Accepts the principle of extra compensation for disabled passengers and unaccompanied children, but requires safeguards and a clear claim process.
  1. Rejected amendments
  • Scope changes – Rejects extending the rules to all flights arriving in the EU, to avoid sudden legal and enforcement problems.
  • Extraordinary circumstances – Rejects making the list exhaustive or removing the definition.
  • Denied boarding – Keeps the current definition that allows legitimate reasons for refusal.
  • Insurance and guarantee fund – No immediate rule; will be studied later.
  • Double compensation – Passengers can only get compensation once per journey.
  • Payment forms – Keeps the option for vouchers or other non‑cash payments with passenger consent.
  • Deadlines – Rejects very short or unclear time limits for information, reimbursement, or assistance.
  • Ticket transfer – Rejects allowing ticket transfer after death to avoid a second‑hand ticket market.
  • Transparency and hand baggage – Keeps current rules; no new free hand‑bag allowance.
  1. Conclusion – The Commission will keep working with Parliament and the Council to balance strong passenger protection with a workable framework for airlines.

Licensing: The summaries on this page are available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).

The source