EUFORYa
Track EU Parliament activity with clear, human-friendly updates.
Track EU Parliament activity with clear, human-friendly updates.
Counting EU Money: Simple Rules to Make Spending Transparent
Published January 22, 2026
Goal: Track EU spending better
Community improvement
Clickbaity title? Suggest change
This resolution says the EU Parliament wants a simpler, clearer system to track how EU money is spent, using reliable indicators that show real results, so the money boosts competitiveness and is transparent.
EU Parliament Resolution ā 22āÆJanuaryāÆ2026
The European Parliament has adopted a resolution on how the EU should measure and control the use of money that is meant to boost future competitiveness. The main points are:
-
Purpose of the resolution
⢠The EU must spend money in a way that is economical, efficient and effective.
⢠To do this, the Parliament wants clear, reliable performance indicators that show whether the money actually achieves its goals. -
Key background documents
⢠The Draghi report (2024) says the EU needs an extra ā¬750ā800āÆbillion a year (4.4ā4.7āÆ% of EU GDP) from 2025ā2030 to close the investment gap.
⢠The Letta report (2024) and the 2025/2034 multiāannual financial framework (MFF) set the overall budget rules.
⢠The European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) will be part of the 2028ā2034 MFF. -
What the resolution says about performance indicators
⢠Types of indicators ā
ā Input (money, staff, equipment)
ā Output (what is produced, e.g., number of projects)
ā Result (direct effects, e.g., jobs created)
ā Impact (longāterm changes, e.g., higher exports).
⢠Indicators must be RACER: relevant, accepted, credible, easy to use, and robust.
⢠They should be available in an open, machineāreadable format and, where possible, broken down by gender and aggregated across programmes.
⢠The resolution calls for a single, harmonised set of core indicators for all EU programmes, replacing the current 5āÆ000+ heterogeneous indicators used in the 2021ā2027 MFF and the 7āÆ000 milestones of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). -
Simplification and transparency
⢠The current system is too complex and creates a heavy reporting burden, especially for small and mediumāsized enterprises (SMEs) and local authorities.
⢠The Parliament wants a āonceāonlyā principle: data should be collected once and reused for all reports.
⢠All indicator data and methods must be publicly available in real time, with clear links to the final beneficiaries of the funding. -
Data quality and audit
⢠The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has repeatedly found that many indicators lack reliable baseline data and clear definitions.
⢠The resolution demands that all data be traceable down to the contract and beneficiary level, and that any suspected fraud be reported to the European AntiāFraud Office and the European Public Prosecutorās Office.
⢠Independent verification by national audit bodies and the ECA is required, and the results must be shared with Parliament. -
Rule of law and competitiveness
⢠The resolution stresses that a strong rule of law is essential for investor confidence.
⢠It proposes adding indicators on the functioning of the justice system, antiācorruption measures, and checks and balances. -
Specific competitiveness indicators
⢠Innovation ā number of EUāfunded projects, patents, startāups, and the share of womenāled startāups.
⢠Industrial relocation ā number of SMEs moving to the EU, jobs created, and share of critical raw materials sourced locally.
⢠Energy ā joint industrial energy purchases, renewable share, and reduction in energy prices.
⢠Skills ā people trained in STEM, employment rates, and wage growth.
⢠Regulatory burden ā time from application to disbursement, number of appeals, and reduction in administrative costs for SMEs. -
Risk assessment and impact modelling
⢠The Parliament calls for a robust risk assessment framework for highārisk, highāreward projects.
⢠It encourages the use of macroāeconomic models that capture household and firm heterogeneity to better estimate the impact of EU spending. -
Next steps
⢠The resolution instructs the Parliamentās President to send it to the Council and the Commission for further action.
In short, the EU Parliament wants a simpler, clearer, and more trustworthy system for measuring how EU money is spent to make Europe more competitive, while ensuring that the data is reliable, transparent, and linked to real outcomes.
Licensing: The summaries on this page are available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
The source